Legal Opinion

First Credit Union v. Courtney

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 12, 2013No. 2 CA-CV 2013-0005PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants Craig and Janine Courtney (“the Courtneys”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment and from its entry of a deficiency judgment against them. On appeal, they argue the court erred by not dismissing First Credit Union’s (“First Credit”) complaint as premature, by not finding that an anti-deficiency statute barred a deficiency judgment, and by entering a deficiency judgment against them when the underlying indebtedness had been extinguished. Because we find no error, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural History

¶ 2 The parties largely agree…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony SocietyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand HaddockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. LaosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Ader v. Estate of FelgerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. State ex rel. Brnovich v. Maricopa County Community College District BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. Pi'ikea, LLC v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API