First Credit Union v. Courtney
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants Craig and Janine Courtney (“the Courtneys”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment and from its entry of a deficiency judgment against them. On appeal, they argue the court erred by not dismissing First Credit Union’s (“First Credit”) complaint as premature, by not finding that an anti-deficiency statute barred a deficiency judgment, and by entering a deficiency judgment against them when the underlying indebtedness had been extinguished. Because we find no error, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural History
¶ 2 The parties largely agree…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony SocietyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand HaddockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- John Munic Enterprises, Inc. v. LaosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Ader v. Estate of FelgerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- State ex rel. Brnovich v. Maricopa County Community College District BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Pi'ikea, LLC v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.