Legal Opinion

Pi'ikea, LLC v. Williamson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 26, 2014No. 2 CA-CV 2013-0065PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellants William and Marianne Williamson, husband and wife and co-trustees of the Williamson Family Trust (the William-sons), appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Pi’Ikea, LLC (Pi’Ikea). 1 They argue the court erred in finding Pi’Ikea was not required to mitigate its damages after default of a note the Williamsons had guaranteed, and assert that a genuine issue of material fact regarding mitigation precluded summary judgment. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 In reviewing a summary…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Johnny R. Austad and Dorothy Austad, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Holmes v. GravesArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ader v. Estate of FelgerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Monroe v. Az AcreageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Lewis v. Debord and Nelson-DebordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Aprea II v. HafterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API