Pi'ikea, LLC v. Williamson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants William and Marianne Williamson, husband and wife and co-trustees of the Williamson Family Trust (the William-sons), appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Pi’Ikea, LLC (Pi’Ikea). 1 They argue the court erred in finding Pi’Ikea was not required to mitigate its damages after default of a note the Williamsons had guaranteed, and assert that a genuine issue of material fact regarding mitigation precluded summary judgment. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 In reviewing a summary…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Johnny R. Austad and Dorothy Austad, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Holmes v. GravesArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Tempe v. Outdoor Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ader v. Estate of FelgerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Melinda S. Workman v. Verde Wellness Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Monroe v. Az AcreageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Lewis v. Debord and Nelson-DebordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Aprea II v. HafterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014