Legal Opinion

Blemel v. Shattuck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1893No. 16,107PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

This was a proceeding by way of petition, *499ill tlie Circuit Ooui’t, under the provisions of the drainage act approved April 6, 1885. Elliott’s Supp., section 1284.

The petition was referred to the drainage commissioners, pursuant to the provisions of the second section of said act. On objection by the appellant, to the competency of said commissioners, the order referring the petition to them was set aside, and new commissioners were appointed, and the petition was referred to them. They afterwards reported :

First. That the drainage proposed is practicable.

Secondly. That the drainage, if…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shugart v. MilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Searle v. WhippermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Zigler v. MengesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Lang v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Johnson v. HosfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State Ex Rel. Barner v. White Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Long v. RuchIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Lutz v. GOLDBLATT BROTHERS, INC., ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Wabash Railway Co. v. City of GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API