Searle v. Whipperman
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Cass Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Best, C.
— One William W. Hqney brought an action to-foreclose a mortgage against Nathan Ridenger and others, to-which proceeding he made the appellee Whipperman a party as the holder of a subsequent mortgage, and the appellant a party as the owner of the equity of redemption. Thereupon the appellee Whipperman filed a cross complaint to foreclose a mortgage upon the same premises made by Ridenger against him and others and against the appellant as the owner of the property, and to recover a personal judgment against him upon. *425his assumption of the debt. Process was served, and subsequently,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Campbell v. RouttIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Teal v. SpanglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Richardson v. HowkIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Dunkle v. ElstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Woodward v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Warner v. Young America Volunteer Fire DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Coleman v. City of GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Cohoon v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- American Insurance v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.