Legal Opinion

Zigler v. Menges

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1889No. 13,866PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

— The appellee petitioned for the construction of a ditch, and the appellant remonstrated against it. A special verdict was returned, of which this is the substance : The lands along the entire line of the proposed ditch, except for a distance of three hundred feet at the lower end, are wet and marshy. The natural trend of the land through which the ditch will run is such as to cause the surface water, when unobstructed, to flow from a southeast direction north and west, in the general direction of the ditch. Before the Lake Shore and Michigan Railroad was built, which was about the year…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Dingley v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Sisson v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Sauntman v. MaxwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Steele v. EmpsomIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Bemis v. Guirl Drainage Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API