Lutz v. GOLDBLATT BROTHERS, INC., ETC.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPfaff, P. J.
— Appellant brought this action to recover damages by reason of injuries allegedly sustained when she slipped and fell on the premises of appellee, the proprietor of a store. Trial by jury resulted in a verdict for appellee.
Three interrogatories were submitted to the jury and much of appellant’s argument concerns these. For the purpose of this appeal it is not necessary to set forth these interrogatories or their answers. Regardless of how they might have been answered they did not cover sufficient facts so as to form the basis of a motion for judgment on the interrogatories notwithstanding…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- McCague v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- Perry, Matthews-Buskirk Stone Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- McCallister v. MountIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Indiana Civil Rights Commission v. Sutherland LumberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Scott v. KruegerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Penwell v. Western & Southern Life Ins. Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hernandez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Witherspoon v. SalmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.