Legal Opinion
Oman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 19, 1949No. 3923PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
This is an action against the United States brought under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680, and arising out of the Taylor Grazing Act, as amended, 43 U.S.C.A. §§ 315—315q, and the Federal Range Code for Grazing Districts, 43 C.F.R. Sec. 161.1 et seq., promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the authority vested in him by the Taylor Act.
Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that defendant’s employees, in charge of grazing activities on the public domain in the San Rafael District, Utah, wrongfully aided,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gleason v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Osborne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. NoppenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Firemen's Fund Insurance v. SchreiberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- West Ex Rel. West v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ness Investment Corporation, and Canyon Lake Resort, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, and Fred Wirth, ForestsupervisorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United Mine Workers of America v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Cox United States v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Bulloch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1955
- United States v. Alton Morrell, United States of America v. Nick Chournos, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.