Osborne v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
The Osbornes, appellants herein, were in possession oí a contiguous area of stock grazing land consisting of land owned by them, land leased by them, and land in the Kaibab National Forest under permit (36 Code of Federal Regulations, § 231.9) issued to them. Before the institution of this litigation the national forest land under permit was declared appropriated for military purposes. All of such contiguous lands, except certain rights therein which need not here be noticed, were included in one eminent domain proceeding filed in the district court by the government,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Grant M. Acton v. United States v. W. Clifton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Hubbard v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Roy Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Bayshore Sew. Co. v. Dep't. of Env., NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.