Legal Opinion

United States v. Cox United States v. Beasley

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 31, 1951No. 4201_1PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

These consolidated appeals involve the common question of the correct measure of just compensation for the taking of private lands by the Government for public purposes.

All of the lands involved are cattle ranches of the respective appellees in Dona Ana and Otero Counties, New Mexico, appropriated by the United States for war purposes under the Second War Powers Act, § 201, 56 Stat. 177, 50 U.S.C.A. § 171a. The ranches consist of land owned in fee by the ranchers, land leased from the State of New Mexico, and the public domain on which the ranchers hold permits under the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. SowardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Federal Lands Legal Consortium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  4. Grant M. Acton v. United States v. W. Clifton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Hubbard v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API