Legal Opinion

United States v. Alton Morrell, United States of America v. Nick Chournos, (Two Cases)

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1964No. 7419-7421PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

The problems of the open range are with us again. Plaintiffs-appellees sued under the Federal Tort Claims Act 1 to recover for trespasses on their lands by stock of the holders of permits under the Taylor Grazing Act. 2 The claims are that federal officials aided and abetted the trespasses. The government says, among other things, that the officials did no more than issue the permits and that such actions are the exercise of discretionary functions for which no recovery is allowed. 3 Trial was to the court. Morrell recovered judgment for $97,500 and Choumos for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hatahley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Oman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  4. Chournos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  5. Alfred Heber Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Myers & Myers, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Federal Lands Legal Consortium v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Ernest J. Hendry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API