Legal Opinion

Wat Henry Pontiac Co. v. Bradley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 1949No. 33323PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an action to recover the sum of $324.56 damages for breach of an express oral warranty of a used car purchased by plaintiff, defendant in error, from the defendant, plaintiff in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiff and defendant. A trial on the merits resulted in a judgment against the defendant in the sum of $279.56. From this verdict and order overruling motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

The plaintiff alleged that on the 22nd day of October, 1944, she purchased a used Buick automobile from the defendant, paying $890 cash for same; that the same was purchased by oral…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. LawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Smith v. BolsterWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. J. B. Colt Co. v. KoehnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Pierce v. CrowlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dailey v. Holiday Distributing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Perry v. Lawson Ford Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Martin Rispens & Son v. Hall Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Scovil v. ChilcoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API