Legal Opinion
Scovil v. Chilcoat
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 24, 1967No. 40843PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
The plaintiffs in error herein will be referred to as defendants and the defendant in error will be referred to as plaintiff in accordance with their respective positions in the trial court.
Plaintiff alleged that on October 22, 1960, he took his 1956 model Volkswagen to the place of business of defendant, Scovil Motor Co., Inc., for repairs; that due to the condition of the engine in plaintiff’s automobile, the defendants’ shop foreman recommended that rather than repairing the old engine, it would be more economical to install a new engine in such automobile; that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cochran v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Cooke v. TownleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Hanna v. ParrishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- International Harvester Co. v. LawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Pemberton v. DeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Steiger v. Commerce Acceptance of Oklahoma City, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Hillcrest Country Club v. N.D. Judds Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Austin v. Wilkerson, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Association of Unit Owners of the Deer Lodge Condominium v. Big Sky of Montana, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
- Lovington Cattle Feeders, Inc. v. Abbott LaboratoriesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.