International Harvester Co. v. Lawyer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; W. R. Taylor, Judge. Action by J. E. Lawyer against the International Harvester Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWS, C.
The parties will be designated as in the trial court. This action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover damages from the defendant for an alleged breach of warranty in the sale of certain automobiles. The plaintiff based his demand for damages upon his claim that during the year 1910 and following he was an implement dealer at Maud, Okla., and that the defendant, knowing his desire to purchase an automobile suitable to the Maud territory to sell to his customers, sold to plaintiff four automobiles, which its agent orally warranted to be fit for use in that territory;…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Schuchardt v. AllensSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Herring v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. HolidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bierman v. . City Mills Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Gould v. SteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. RolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Ransom v. Robinson Packer Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Scovil v. ChilcoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Wat Henry Pontiac Co. v. BradleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- OAK TREE PARTNERS, LLC v. WILLIAMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.