Helmandollar v. M.A.N. Truck & Bus Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Claimant assigns as error the denial of unemployment insurance benefits. We agree that there is error.
Beginning 11 August 1983, claimant was absent from work for four consecutive days due to illness. Employer’s policy, posted as well as published in a handbook provided to all employees, requires employees who are absent due to illness to call in by 7:30 a.m. for the 7:00 a.m. shift. A call after 7:30 a.m. is treated as “no call.” Written warnings are issued for the first two violations of this rule and a third occurrence is a dischargeable offense.
Uncontroverted evidence showed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Intercraft Industries Corp. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- In Re CollingsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Matter of CantrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Butler v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Urback v. East Carolina UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Binney v. Banner Therapy ProductsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Binney v. Banner Therapy ProductsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Guilford County v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991