Rose v. Conlin
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff Emma Rose in an action wherein the plaintiffs sought to have it determined that the said Emma Rose was the equitable owner of a certain judgment for the sum of $15,560, which had been recovered by the defendant Henry Conlin in the case of Conlin v. Southern Pac. R. R. Co., 40 Cal. App. 743, [182 Pac. 71].
The facts out of which that case and also the present case arose may be summarized as follows: The San Francisco & San Jose Railroad Company was incorporated under the laws of the state of California on August 18, 1860, for the term…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Beronio v. Ventura County Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. BlissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- In re Mayor of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. LeedsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Vallejo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Thibodo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- People ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Redwood Baseline, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Morse v. Board of Com'rs of Marshall CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.