Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Lampert

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 25, 2001No. 99-06-30570-M; CA A107946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Plaintiff, an inmate at Snake River Correctional Institution, appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In his petition, plaintiff alleged that he was unlawfully confined because the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) erroneously deferred his parole release date from 1999 to 2001, based on its finding that he suffered from a present severe emotional disturbance that caused him to be a danger to the health or safety of the community. We affirm.

Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiffs petition after issuance of the writ. See ORS 34.680(1) (motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Merrill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Peek v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. McClintock v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Fort v. PALMATTERCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marc A. Burnett v. Robert O. Lampert Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Gordon v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Lovelace v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Burnett v. LampertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. McDade v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API