Lovelace v. Morrow
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his claim that he is entitled to habeas corpus relief. Defendant asserts that plaintiffs appeal is untimely and must be dismissed. As explained below, we agree with defendant that this appeal is untimely and dismiss the appeal.
The pertinent procedural facts are as follows. Plaintiff petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus and, in January 1999, the trial court issued the writ ordering defendant to file a return. Defendant filed a return asserting that plaintiffs confinement was lawful. Plaintiff filed a replication and later an amended…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of Marriage of MullinaxOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Gage v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Barber v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- McClintock v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Steel Capital Steel, LLC v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015