Legal Opinion

Hoidale v. Vogtel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1924No. 23,746PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The Century Milling Company, a domestic corporation, was duly placed in the hands of a receiver, and the court made an order in the proceeding assessing the stockholders of the corporation $100 upon *107each share of stock held. Charles Vogtel owned 1,050 shares of common stock and 1,050 shares of preferred stock in the company. He died testate, and executors of his estate were appointed. After the time for creditors to present claims against his estate had expired, but before final settlement and distribution, the receiver of the milling company obtained leave from the probate court to file a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. Phelps v. Consolidated Vermillion & Extension Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Neff v. LammSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. v. Goodhue County Co-Operative Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Bolsta v. BremerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. In Re Estate of SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. State ex rel. Benson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. In Re Estate of SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API