Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Consolidated Vermillion & Extension Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 30, 1923No. 23,477PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

The Consolidated Vermillion & Extension Company is a corporation organized under the laws of this state. On October 23, 1920, *211Richardson Phelps was appointed receiver of the company in an action brought to sequestrate its property. He presented a petition to the district court of Hennepin county, stating that claims against the company aggregating more than $300,000 had been filed with him; that its authorized capital was $900,000, divided into 450,000 shares of the par value of $2 each, of which about 400,000 were outstanding and owned by about 1,300 stockholders scattered throughout…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Marin v. AugedahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Selig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Straw & Ellsworth Manufacturing Co. v. L. D. Kilbourne Boot & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Bardwell v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. v. Goodhue County Co-Operative Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Bolsta v. BremerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Woodward v. SonnesynSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. Brantner v. Red River Valley Livestock Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Hoidale v. VogtelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API