Phelps v. Consolidated Vermillion & Extension Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
The Consolidated Vermillion & Extension Company is a corporation organized under the laws of this state. On October 23, 1920, *211Richardson Phelps was appointed receiver of the company in an action brought to sequestrate its property. He presented a petition to the district court of Hennepin county, stating that claims against the company aggregating more than $300,000 had been filed with him; that its authorized capital was $900,000, divided into 450,000 shares of the par value of $2 each, of which about 400,000 were outstanding and owned by about 1,300 stockholders scattered throughout…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Marin v. AugedahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Selig v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Straw & Ellsworth Manufacturing Co. v. L. D. Kilbourne Boot & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Bardwell v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. v. Goodhue County Co-Operative Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Bolsta v. BremerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Woodward v. SonnesynSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Brantner v. Red River Valley Livestock Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Hoidale v. VogtelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.