Legal Opinion
Bolsta v. Bremer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 10, 1942No. 33,105PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gallagher, Chiee Justice.
This action was brought by C. H. Bolsta as receiver of the First State Bank of Correll, Minnesota, for the benefit of G. F. Cash-man, the only creditor of the bank, against Otto Bremer, the sole stockholder, to recover assets of the bank alleged to have been wrongfully transferred to defendant in fraud of creditors. From a judgment dismissing the action with prejudice, plaintiff appeals.
The judgment of dismissal was based upon a finding by the trial court that in a proceeding instituted by Oashman under Mason St. 1927, § 8025, et seq., to obtain an assessment against…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson Co. v. WhartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Straw & Ellsworth Manufacturing Co. v. L. D. Kilbourne Boot & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Griffin v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- State ex rel. Spratt v. SprattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Russell v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Druggists Insurance v. Thompson Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Whitford Liquor License CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Gibson v. GibsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Daniel G. Mandich v. William W. WattersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Carl v. DetoffolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.