Legal Opinion

Neff v. Lamm

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 1906No. Nos. 14,820—(166)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Blue Earth county, Eorin Cray, J., denying a motion for a new trial. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

The plaintiff and respondent filed in the probate court of Blue Earth county a claim for $5,000 against the estate of Stephen Lamm, deceased, dated September 20, 1904. That claim was for an assessment levied tty the order of the district court of St. Louis county upon the. capital- stock of the Motor Line Improvement Company, a defunct corporation, of which the plaintiff was receiver. It was contended that Stephen Lamm at the time of his death was the owner of fifty shares of capital stock of that corporation of the par value of $100 per share. Objections to the allowance of the claim were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Great Western Telegraph Co. v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Straw & Ellsworth Manufacturing Co. v. L. D. Kilbourne Boot & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Minneapolis Harvester Works v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Mortgage Security Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. McCabe Brothers Co. v. Farmers Grain Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Phelps v. Consolidated Vermillion & Extension Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Hoidale v. VogtelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. In Re Estate of SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API