Legal Opinion

Clendenning v. McCall

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1945No. 30092PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

Where a Probate Court made a valid appointment of a guardian of the person and estate of an incompetent person, may a Court of Common Pleas grant such ward a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that such ward is no longer an incompetent person?

The trial court in its opinion acknowledged the exclusive jurisdiction of the Probate Court over the guardian but in its journal entry found and ordered “that Maude Clendenning is no longer an incompetent person by reason of mental disability and that she is now mentally competent to take care of her person and her property and that the cause for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re RemusOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Unger v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Ex Parte JustesOhio Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. BrommersWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Masitto v. MasittoOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In re HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Love v. TupmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In re Guardianship of JadwisiakOhio Supreme Court · 1992

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API