Legal Opinion
Unger v. Wolfe
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1938No. 26929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
In their brief the plaintiffs urge that their claim is one for necessaries furnished the incompetent. The defendants do not dispute this.
In ruling upon the demurrer of the gmardian the trial court held that it had no jurisdiction of the subject of the action. Was this correct?
Section 8 of Article IY of the Constitution of Ohio contains the following provisions:
“The Probate Court shall have jurisdiction in probate and testamentary matters, the appointment of administrators and guardians, the settlement of the accounts of executors, administrators and guardians, and such jurisdiction in habeas…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Clendenning v. McCallOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Burns v. DailyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Wilburn v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Vanstone v. VanstoneOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Caudill v. CaudillOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.