In re Hunt
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.
Appellant contends that the dependency complaint filed by the appellee was insufficient to give the Juvenile Court jurisdiction; that the ex parte emergency custody order is consequently unlawful; and that the appellant is entitled to a writ of habeas corpus to dissolve the unlawful custody.
The language of the complaint is as follows:
“The undersigned, Lillian Hunt, says that she has knowledge of certain children, to-wit: Christopher Steven and David Michael Hunt age 7 and 5 years, respectively * * * who appear to be dependent in that their condition or environment is such as to warrant the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Clendenning v. McCallOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re BursonOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- In re PiazzaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- In Re Anteau, a MinorOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Perales v. NinoOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of TrappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- In re CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- In re M.W.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.