Legal Opinion

In re Hunt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1976No. 75-1128PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.

Appellant contends that the dependency complaint filed by the appellee was insufficient to give the Juvenile Court jurisdiction; that the ex parte emergency custody order is consequently unlawful; and that the appellant is entitled to a writ of habeas corpus to dissolve the unlawful custody.

The language of the complaint is as follows:

“The undersigned, Lillian Hunt, says that she has knowledge of certain children, to-wit: Christopher Steven and David Michael Hunt age 7 and 5 years, respectively * * * who appear to be dependent in that their condition or environment is such as to warrant the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Clendenning v. McCallOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. In Re BursonOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In re PiazzaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. In Re Anteau, a MinorOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Perales v. NinoOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Matter of TrappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  4. In re CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In re M.W.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API