Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Justes
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1930No. 22141PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This cause came on to be heard upon the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and was submitted to the Court. Upon consideration whereof it is ordered by the Court that said petition be, and the same is, denied for the reason that the petitioner has an adequate remedy at law.
Writ denied.
Marshall, C. J., Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., not participating.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Clendenning v. McCallOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Weigel v. GrossnickleOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
- Roden v. HubbardOhio Supreme Court · 1981