Seattle-First National Bank v. Brommers
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
These two appeals arose out of the same trial. Appellants Gene J. and Jean Brommers, doing business as Brommers Logging and Brommers Logging and Construction Company, and appellant, Ella Bottiger, separately appealed from the trial court's judgment for respondent, Seattle-First National Bank, as successor-guardian of the estate of Henry F. Bottiger, an incompetent. The appeals concern the liability of the three appellants to the guardianship estate. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The findings of fact are largely undisputed. Henry and Ella Bottiger were married on November 11, 1953.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Rayonier, Incorporated v. F. Arnold PolsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Graffell v. HoneysuckleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re Adoption of Duren v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Clendenning v. McCallOhio Supreme Court · 1945
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re the Welfare of ColyerWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Ridgeview Properties v. StarbuckWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Fisher Properties, Inc. v. Arden-Mayfair, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.