Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. DCX, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 22, 2003No. CIV.A.00-1317 (RWR)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Lamont Mitchell, Viola Bowen and the Equal Rights Center (“ERC”), have filed a seven-count complaint alleging that DCX, Inc. d/b/a Diamond Cab Company of D.C. (“Diamond”) failed to dispatch cabs in response to requests from Mitchell and Bowen for service because the requests were for service in the predominantly African-American Southeast quadrant of the District of Columbia (“Southeast”). Plaintiffs further allege that the experience Mitchell and Bowen had reflects Diamond’s pattern and practice of not providing cab service to…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Lemmons v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Marshall v. Honeywell Technology Solutions, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Estenos v. PAHO/WHO Federal Credit UnionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Smith v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Jo v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.