Legal Opinion

Association of Unit Owners of Timbercrest Condominiums v. Warren

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 27, 2011No. C090892CV; A146137PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, P. J.

We write to address this issue of appellate procedure: When a party has filed a motion for new trial and a notice of appeal is filed before the motion for new trial is decided, must the appellant file a new notice of appeal after the motion for new trial is decided? We conclude that no new notice of appeal is required. Accordingly, we grant respondent’s motion for determination of jurisdiction, determine that the court has jurisdiction of this appeal, and direct that the appeal proceed.

The essential procedural events are these: The trial court resolved plaintiffs claims by granting…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Carter v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Gillespie v. KononenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Highway Commission v. Fisch-Or, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Propp v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Association of Unit Owners of Timbercrest Condominiums v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Guembes v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Singh v. SidhuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. AlegreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API