State Highway Commission v. Fisch-Or, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
This is a state highway condemnation case. The jury awarded the landowner substantially less than the landowner had sought. The trial court, believing that the jury had been incorrectly instructed, granted a new trial. The commission now appeals from the *414order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial.
The first question is whether or not, at the time it allowed the landowner’s motion for a new trial, the trial court had jurisdiction of the motion. If the time during which the court lawfully could act had expired, then the order granting a new trial would be void and it would not be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Baden v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
- State of Oregon v. CERRUTIOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Dibble v. David Hodes Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
- State Highway Commission v. Morehouse Holding Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Carter v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Charco, Inc. v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Williams v. Laurence-David, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CrawleyOregon Supreme Court · 1966
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.