Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Fisch-Or, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1965PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is a state highway condemnation case. The jury awarded the landowner substantially less than the landowner had sought. The trial court, believing that the jury had been incorrectly instructed, granted a new trial. The commission now appeals from the *414order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial.

The first question is whether or not, at the time it allowed the landowner’s motion for a new trial, the trial court had jurisdiction of the motion. If the time during which the court lawfully could act had expired, then the order granting a new trial would be void and it would not be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. ParkerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Baden v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State of Oregon v. CERRUTIOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Dibble v. David Hodes Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State Highway Commission v. Morehouse Holding Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Carter v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Charco, Inc. v. CohnOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Williams v. Laurence-David, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. CrawleyOregon Supreme Court · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API