Legal Opinion

State v. Alegre

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 2016No. 99CR1257AB; A155143Published

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Defendant appeals the denial of his petition for court-appointed counsel for the purposes of DNA testing. He contends that, because his petition met all of the statutory requirements, appointment of counsel was mandatory under ORS 138.694 (2013), amended by Oregon Laws 2015, chapter 564, section 3.1 On review of the full record, it is clear that the trial court denied his petition because it believed, incorrectly, that defendant sought counsel for purposes of direct appeal. Because the court never evaluated the adequacy of the petition for the purpose of preparing and filing a motion for DNA…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BaroneOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Association of Unit Owners of Timbercrest Condominiums v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Association of Unit Owners of Timbercrest Condominiums v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. TempletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. NetzlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API