Legal Opinion

Koranda v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1986No. C5-86-1044PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This appeal originates from a claim for underinsured motorist benefits by respondents Richard and Viola Koranda for injuries they sustained in a December 27, 1983 rear-end collision with an automobile driven by Frederick Manfred. Appellant Austin Mutual Insurance Company is the Koran-das’ underinsurance carrier. The accident took place on an interstate highway where a vehicle owned by the State of Minnesota was removing snow and creating visibility problems. Pursuant to the Korandas’ demand, the matter was submitted to under-insured motorist arbitration.

The arbitration…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Cournoyer v. American Television & Radio Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FruchtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1989
  2. E.D.S. Construction Co. v. North End Health Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Gruman v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Pirsig v. Pleasant Mound Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. SankeyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API