Pirsig v. Pleasant Mound Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Edward Pirsig appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate an arbitration award for evident partiality. We affirm.
FACTS
Edward Pirsig made a claim on the Far-mate insurance policy issued to him by respondent Pleasant Mound Mutual Fire Insurance Company after tools were stolen from his farm. A dispute arose over the value of the stolen tools, and the parties agreed to submit the dispute to a panel of appraisers pursuant to the terms of the policy.
After Pirsig and Pleasant Mound had each selected an appraiser, the two appraisers were to select a third,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Health Services Management Corp. v. Charles Hughes, D/B/A Charles Hughes & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Toyota of Berkeley, a Corporation v. Automobile Salesmen's Union, Local 1095, United Food and Commercial Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ronning v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Aaron v. Illinois Farmers Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Kennedy, Matthews, Landis, Healy & Pecora, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Manson v. Dain Bosworth Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, District Council No. 14, Local Union No. 551 v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.