Legal Opinion

Gruman v. Hendrickson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1987No. C6-87-1452PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.

Respondent Gruman’s personal injury claim against Hendrickson and Burlington Northern was submitted to arbitration. Appellant no-fault carrier moved to intervene, but that motion was denied. Following the arbitration award, appellant, again attempted to intervene and vacate the arbitration award. Appellant further requested, upon judgment entered in favor of Gru-man, it receive the amount of no-fault benefits paid to Gruman. The trial court denied appellant’s motion and this appeal followed.

Appellant argues the trial court erred because (1) appellant has met the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Grudem Brothers Co. v. Great Western Piping Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Milbrandt v. American Legion Post of MoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Petry v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  2. Clark Fork Coalition v. Montana Department of Environmental QualityMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. BE & K Construction Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Gruman v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Principal Financial Group v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API