Legal Opinion

Crowder v. Jenkins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1971No. 7129DC90PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the allowance by the court of the defendants’ motion made during the trial to amend the sheriff’s return in question. According to its location in the record on appeal, this motion was made and allowed at the close of all the evidence.

The pertinent part of G.S. 162-14, the statute upon which this action is based, reads as follows:

“For every false return, the sheriff shall forfeit and pay five hundred dollars, one-moiety thereof to the party aggrieved and the other to him that will sue for the same, and moreover be further liable to the action of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bonham v. . CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. H. C. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Champion v. WallerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Piedmont Manufacturing Co. v. BuxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Buie v. High Point Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Santora, McKay & Ranieri v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Inman v. InmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Ward v. ZabadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Cully's Motorcross Park, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API