Legal Opinion

Ward v. Zabady

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1987No. 8610SC724PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

I

Defendant argues that the trial court erred in entering judgment for plaintiff, because there was insufficient evidence that he breached the contract. We disagree.

In ruling that defendant had breached his contract with plaintiff, the trial court, sitting as judge and jury, made the following relevant findings of fact:

9. That the defendant without legal excuse and unjusti-fiedly [sic] failed to provide for the organization of the holding company.

11. That if such a Cayman Island corporation was formed by the defendant, such corporation formation did not fulfill the requirement in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Lindner v. Durham Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Buie v. Daniel International Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BaconSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. First Union National Bank of North Carolina v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API