Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. H. C. Jones Construction Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
Defendants’ assignments of error 1 through 4 relate to the exclusion of evidence. These assignments do not comply with Rule 19(3), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, in that appellant did not incorporate therein the excluded evidence and thus disclose the alleged error. They will not, therefore, be considered. Pratt v. Bishop, 257 N.C. 486, 126 S.E. 2d 597. In our view of this case, however, they are immaterial.
Although appellant does not raise the point, this case presents a novel situation in that the issues submitted to the jury did not arise upon the pleadings but upon a contract…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pratt v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Chisholm v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Tucker v. . SatterthwaiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Johnson v. LambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. HedrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Currence v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.