Legal Opinion

Buie v. High Point Associates Ltd. Partnership

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1995No. 94-315PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Judge.

Defendant HPALP argues three issues on appeal: (1) the court erred in finding the drainage system to be a non-residential use in violation of the restrictive covenants; (2) the court erred in requiring the defendants to return the restricted property to its undeveloped resi dential state, and (3) the judgment should be vacated since HPALP transferred its interest in the easements and shopping center to another partnership prior to the entry of judgment. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the trial court’s entry of judgment.

I

Defendant-appellant HPALP first assigns as error…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Long v. BranhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Ingle v. StubbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Tull v. Doctors Building, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Blackwell v. ButtsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Starmount Co. v. Greensboro Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Webster Enterprises, Inc. v. Selective InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Atlantic Veneer Corp. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Chestnut Real Estate Partnership v. HuberCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Fed. Point Yacht Club Ass'n, Inc. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Schwartz v. Banbury Woods Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API