Legal Opinion

In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person, Coconino County No. MH 1425

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 14, 1993No. 1 CA-CV 92-0269-MHPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLABORNE, Presiding Judge.

This is a mental health involuntary commitment case. Appellant was found to be persistently and acutely disabled and a danger to himself and others after a hearing conducted pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 36-539 (Supp.1992). Appellant was committed by court order to inpatient treatment at the Guidance Center in Flagstaff, Arizona, for a period not to exceed 180 days. It is from this order that Appellant now appeals.

Three issues are raised on appeal:

1. Whether the commitment order is void because the state failed to present two witnesses…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schade v. DiethrichArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Exodyne Properties, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. In Re BurchettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Matter No. MH 862-16-84Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH 2081-3-90Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered PersonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In re MH 2007-001236Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. In re MH 2008-000438Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API