Legal Opinion

Schade v. Diethrich

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1988No. CV-87-0072-PRPublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

Edward B. Diethrich, M.D. seeks review of a court of appeals’ decision that his promise to develop an “equitable and fair separation agreement” for employee Dewey D. Schade was enforceable on the basis of promissory estoppel. Schade v. Diethrich, No. 1 CA-CIV 8478 (Ariz.Ct.App. Jan. 15, 1987). We granted review to consider the following issues:

1. Whether Diethrich’s promise was enforceable and on what theory;

2. If Schade was entitled to recover, did A.R.S. § 23-355 permit the trial judge to treble the damages;

3. Whether Schade was entitled to prejudgment interest;

4.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Velarde v. Pace Membership Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Lire, Inc. v. Bob's Pizza Inn Restaurants, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & StrawnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. AROK Construction Co. v. Indian Construction ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API