Legal Opinion

Exodyne Properties, Inc. v. City of Phoenix

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 25, 1990No. 1 CA-CV 88-421PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a denial by the City of Phoenix (the City) of an application by appellant Exodyne Properties, Inc. (Exodyne) for permission to demolish five buildings located within the City’s Roosevelt Historic Preservation District. Exodyne substantively challenges the trial court’s interpretation of the Phoenix Historic Preservation Ordinance (the Ordinance) and the trial court’s award of partial attorney’s fees. Because we find that the trial court incorrectly interpreted the Ordinance, we reverse and remand with directions that Exodyne be awarded the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Clark v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN RANCH COMMUNITY ASS'N v. SimonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Motel 6 Operating Ltd. Partnership v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. S & R PROPERTIES v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Bills v. Arizona State Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person, Coconino County No. MH 1425Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API