Legal Opinion

In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 16, 1993No. 2 CA-MH 93-0001PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.

This appeal arises from an involuntary treatment order pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-501 et seq., directing that appellant R.S. be treated at the Arizona State Hospital for not more than 180 days, with out-patient treatment for up to 365 days. The issues raised on appeal are whether substantial evidence supported the trial court’s finding of persistent or acute disability when R.S. was not provided explanations regarding advantages, disadvantages and alternatives to treatment as required by A.R.S. § 36-501(29)(b), and whether appellant’s federal and state due…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gosewisch v. American Honda Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Stewart v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Matter of Cause No. Mh-90-00566Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-4130Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. In Re BurchettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County of Mental Health Case No. MH 94-00592Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. In re MH 2007-001236Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. In re MH 2008-001188Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. In re MH 2008-000438Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. In Re Mh 2008-002659Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API