Legal Opinion

In Re Pima County Mental Health No. MH 2081-3-90

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 14, 1991No. 2 CA MH 90-0004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Judge.

In this involuntary mental health commitment case, the patient appeals from court-ordered, inpatient treatment at the Arizona State Hospital, based upon a finding by clear and convincing evidence that the patient, as a result of a mental disorder, was persistently or acutely disabled. The patient argues the petition for court-ordered treatment should have been dismissed, that there was no reasonable basis for the trial court’s finding that he was persistently or acutely disabled, and that A.R.S. § 36-501(29) is unconstitutional. We affirm.

The patient’s first argument…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  4. Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Case No. MH 1717-1-85Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re P.S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Matter of Cause No. Mh-90-00566Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. In Re the Appeal in Pima County Mental Health Service Action No. MH-1140-6-93.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person, Coconino County No. MH 1425Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. In Re the Commitment of an Alleged Mentally Disordered Person MH 91-00558Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API