Legal Opinion
Rainey v. Eatonton Co-Operative Creamery Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 17, 1943No. 29933PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
‘“A garnishment proceeding is a distinct suit against a separate party, and for an entirely new cause of action/” Anderson v. Ledbetter-Johnson Contractors, 62 Ga. App. 732 (2) (9 S. E. 2d, 860). And the garnishee may answer and dissolve the garnishment by giving a bond; but if the defendant gives the dissolution bond in garnishment proceedings, such a bond changes the parties by changing the issue from one between the plaintiff and the garnishee, to an issue between the plaintiff and defendant. Jackson v. Hogan, 18 Ga. App. 219 (2) (89 S. E. 184); Code, § 46-401; Leake v. Tyner, 112 Ga. 919…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Richardson & Co. v. SubersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Leake v. TynerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Anderson v. Ledbetter-Johnson ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Barkley v. MayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Fouts v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Halpern v. AustinDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1974
- Estridge v. JankoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Kiser v. KiserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Lamb v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- C. & S. NAT. BANK v. Avco Fin. Serv., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.