Legal Opinion

Kiser v. Kiser

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1960No. 38228PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

1. A motion for a directed verdict is a prerequisite to a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (Code, Ann., § 110-113), and where it appears from the record that no such motion was made, a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict cannot be considered. Durden v. Henderson, 212 Ga. 807 (1) (96 S. E. 2d 362). Where, however, it appears from the record that the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict contains a recital that it is made in accordance with a prior motion for a directed verdict, and where no contention is made in the trial court that such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sizer & Co. v. Melton & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Chance v. ChanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Estes v. EstesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Rainey v. Eatonton Co-Operative Creamery Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Durden v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hammond v. PaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Alexander v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. A. M. Kidder & Co. v. Clement A. Evans & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  4. Centennial Equities Corp. v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Engineered Builders, Inc. v. Lamar Nash Buick-Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API