Leake v. Tyner
Supreme Court of Georgia
Garnishment — certiorari. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior court. June 27, 1900.
1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.
Leake as administrator obtained a judgment against Tyner, defendant, and on this judgment instituted garnishment proceedings, causing the Southern Railway Co. to answer what it was indebted to Tyner, or what effects of defendant it had in its hands. The garnishee answered that it was indebted to the defendant in fi. fa. in a given sum, but that the amount for which it was so indebted was for wages of said defendant. This answer was traversed, the plaintiff denying that the sum admitted by the garnishee to be due to the defendant in fi. fa. was for wages as a laborer, and a trial was had on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Foster v. HaynesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Teft v. BoothSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Ware & Owens v. LairdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rainey v. Eatonton Co-Operative Creamery Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Jones v. MarilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Kiser v. KiserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Bullock v. ButtsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Jackson v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.