Richardson & Co. v. Subers
Supreme Court of Georgia
Husband and wife. Married women. Debtor and creditor. Burden of proof. Eraud. JBonafides. Evidence. Presumptions. Before Judge Adams. Decatur superior court. November adjourned term, 1887. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
It appears from the record in this case that ~W. C. Subers and K. Donalson were partners in business in the city of Bainbridge, under the firm name and style of W. C. Subers & Company. Subers became indebted to Donalson, and on the 23d of July, 1880, the firm was dissolved. Subers turned over the entire stock of goods to Donalson in payment of his indebtedness. On August 1st, 1880, Donalson sold the same stock of goods to Mrs. W. M. Subers, the wife of W. C. Subers. Mrs. Subers gave her three promissory notes to Donalson for $500 each, payable at different times, in payment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Atlanta v. WordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Huff v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Primrose v. BrowningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Wilcoxson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cotton States Fertilizer Co. v. ChildsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Gill v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Strickland v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Mattox v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Rainey v. Eatonton Co-Operative Creamery Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.