Eppinger v. Kendrick
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Glenn County and from an order denying a new trial. S. Millington, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This action was brought against M. P. Farnham and J. K. Kendrick upon two promissory-notes, each dated August 19, 1891, payable one day after date, one for two thousand dollars and the other for eight hundred dollars, to the order of Eppinger & Go., upon which there was claimed to remain unpaid eleven hundred and nineteen dollars and four cents and interest. Farnham, having been adjudged an insolvent debtor, did not answer, and the action-proceeded against Kendrick alone, whose answer consisted of a general denial and a special defense, in which it was alleged that on September 12,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bragg v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Harlan v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Bell v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Montgomery v. SayreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kiessig v. AllspaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Grogan v. Valley Trading Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. BunkersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Brandes v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Mead v. Sanwa Bank CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. KellyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.