Legal Opinion

Kiessig v. Allspaugh

California Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1891No. 14405PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

The defendant Lundeen was a surety for his co-defendants, Allspaugh and Hall, upon a bond executed to plaintiff to indemnify ail'd save him harmless against any claims or liens for material or labor used or employed by his principals in the construction of a building which they had theretofore contracted to erect for plaintiff. The contract price for the construction of the building was eight thousand dollars, and by the terms of the building contract the plaintiff was authorized to retain one fourth of that sum in his hands until final settlement between the parties thereto. The complaint…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bragg v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Taylor v. JeterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. County of Glenn v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Patten & Davies Lumber Co. v. McConvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Cox v. New England Equitable Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  4. Honolulu Roofing Co. v. FelixHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Eppinger v. KendrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API