Legal Opinion

Brandes v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1929No. Docket No. 6864PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Respondent brought this action to recover, damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of being struck by an automobile driven by the appellant Manbert and belonging to his employer and coappellant RuckerFuller Desk Company. The trial took place before a jury and respondent was awarded a verdict. Judgment was entered accordingly and this appeal was taken therefrom. A reversal is sought upon the ground mainly that two instructions given at respondent’s request were erroneous, appellants contending that thereby the jury was authorized to find against the Rucker-Fuller Desk Company on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Gleeson v. Virginia Midland RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Volkmar v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Eppinger v. KendrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Guerra v. BalestrieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Caccamo v. SwanstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Washington v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Lewis v. Western Truck LineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API