People v. Bunkers
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. E. C. Hart, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. H. V. Morehouse, J. E. Alexander, J. S. Partridge, and F. C. Jacobs, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMcLAUGHLIN, J.
The defendant was convicted of a felony, to wit, asking and receiving a bribe while a member of the Senate of the state of California, contrary to the provi sions of section 86 of the Penal Code. From the judgment against him and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, he prosecutes this appeal.
It is unnecessary to insert a copy of the indictment, or to consider its sufficiency in this opinion, for such sufficiency was carefully considered in another proceeding, and a copy of the indictment is continued in the decision therein filed. (Application of Bunkers, 1 Cal. App. 61, [81 Pac.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Bedell v. HerringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. McDanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- People v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.